Listing 1 - 2 of 2 |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
Traditional philosophers approached the issues of free will and moral responsibility through conceptual analysis that seldom incorporated findings from empirical science. In recent decades, however, striking developments in psychology and neuroscience have captured the attention of many moral philosophers. This volume of Moral Psychology offers essays, commentaries, and replies by leading philosophers and scientists who explain and use empirical findings from psychology and neuroscience to illuminate old and new problems regarding free will and moral responsibility. The contributors -- who include such prominent scholars as Patricia Churchland, Daniel Dennett, and Michael Gazzaniga -- consider issues raised by determinism, compatibilism, and libertarianism; epiphenomenalism, bypassing, and naturalism; naturalism; and rationality and situationism. These writings show that although science does not settle the issues of free will and moral responsibility, it has enlivened the field by asking novel, profound, and important questions.
Ethics --- Psychology and philosophy --- Neurosciences --- Philosophical anthropology --- General ethics --- Filosofische antropologie --- Algemene ethiek --- Ethics. --- Free will and determinism. --- Responsibility. --- PHILOSOPHY/General --- COGNITIVE SCIENCES/General
Choose an application
Christian church history --- General ethics --- History of civilization --- Art --- naastenliefde --- geschiedenis --- iconografie --- religies --- armoede --- ouderdom --- ziekenzorg --- Nederland --- welfare services --- Algemene ethiek --- Christelijke kerkgeschiedenis --- Kunst --- Cultuurgeschiedenis --- welzijnsvoorzieningen --- naastenliefde. --- geschiedenis. --- iconografie. --- religies. --- armoede. --- ouderdom. --- ziekenzorg. --- Nederland. --- armoede; 'Povertà', 'Povertà del doni', 'Povertà in uno ch'habbia bell'ingegno' (Ripa)
Listing 1 - 2 of 2 |
Sort by
|